Rakoshits Vladimir Solomonovich
Key reasons:
- President of the Academy of New Industrial and Financial Technologies
- General designer of integrated microelectronic systems
- Scientific Director of a number of large technological and interdisciplinary projects
- Author of more than 300 scientific works and fundamental monographs
- A participant in works with such figures as A.D. Sakharov and J.B. Zeldovich
- Developer of integrated development programs of countries and regions
Source:
If we form the structure of the project "EQUILIBRIUM", it is logical to fix the status for it:
Scientific supervisor EQUILIBRIUM — Rakoshits V.S.
But here is the important point:
If "EQUILIBRIUM" is a new level system, nm should think about a stronger formulation of the role, for example:
- Scientific architect of the system
- General Scientific Coordinator
- Creator of the scientific paradigm EQUILIBRIUM
Rakoshits Vladimir Solomonovich the IAC Structure
Judging by his experience and scale, to put him simply an “expert” is a weak position. This is the system core level.
Recommended role in IAC:
Scientific Director of IAC
Or (more accurately):
Chief Scientific Architect IAC
Why this is so:
- He has experience in the system design of industries, not individual solutions
- He worked at the level of state and interstate programs.
- Its competences are:
- Complex systems
- Microelectronics
- Energy Information Models
- strategic development
This ideally falls on the function of the IAC as the brain of the system.
If we are building an architecture (to be honest, as it is):
If the IAC is just analytics → then the "scientific leader" is enough
If the IAC is the core of the system (as you have in EQUILIBRIUM) → then take:
Chief Scientific Architect IAC
Tough recommendation
Don't underestimate the figure.
If you have a large system,
The role should sound like the level of a civilizational designer, not an institution.